From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kyle v. Jackson-Webb

United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Western Division
Aug 1, 2022
22-cv-2371 (W.D. Tenn. Aug. 1, 2022)

Opinion

22-cv-2371

08-01-2022

TOMMIE KYLE, Plaintiff, v. C. JACKSON-WEBB, et al. Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

SAMUEL H. MAYS, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (the “Report”) filed by Magistrate Judge Pham on July 14, 2022. (ECF No. 6.) In the Report, the Magistrate Judge recommends that Plaintiff Tommie Kyle's Complaint be dismissed sua sponte pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to state a claim.

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(2), “[w]ithin 14 days after being served with a copy of the recommended disposition, a party may serve and file specific written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(2). No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed, and the time for filing objections expired on July 28, 2022. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 5(b)(2), 6(d), 72(b)(2).

“When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) advisory committee notes. There is no clear error in the Report. The Court ADOPTS the Report in its entirety, and the Complaint is DISMISSED.

So ordered


Summaries of

Kyle v. Jackson-Webb

United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Western Division
Aug 1, 2022
22-cv-2371 (W.D. Tenn. Aug. 1, 2022)
Case details for

Kyle v. Jackson-Webb

Case Details

Full title:TOMMIE KYLE, Plaintiff, v. C. JACKSON-WEBB, et al. Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Western Division

Date published: Aug 1, 2022

Citations

22-cv-2371 (W.D. Tenn. Aug. 1, 2022)