From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kyle v. Huiet

Supreme Court of Georgia
Nov 13, 1941
17 S.E.2d 745 (Ga. 1941)

Opinion

13938.

NOVEMBER 13, 1941.

Equitable petition. Before Judge Mitchell. Whitfield superior court. August 16, 1941.

H. W. McLarty, for plaintiffs. Clifford Walker, Otis L. Hathcock, and Hardin McCamy, for defendants.


"A paper purporting to be a bill of exceptions, properly certified by the trial judge, but not signed by the plaintiff in error or his counsel, is not a legal bill of exceptions, confers no jurisdiction of the case upon this court, is not amendable to correct the defect, and will be dismissed with or without motion for that purpose. Speer v. Merryman, 56 Ga. 529; Brand v. Garrett, 62 Ga. 165; Wellborn v. Atlanta c. R. Co., 92 Ga. 577 ( 17 S.E. 672); Sumner v. Sumner, 116 Ga. 798 ( 43 S.E. 57); O'Connell v. Friedman, 117 Ga. 949 ( 43 S.E. 1001); Mitchell v. Yow, 147 Ga. 560 ( 94 S.E. 1012); Lott v. Waycross, 152 Ga. 237 ( 110 S.E. 217); Smith v. Jones, 155 Ga. 439 ( 117 S.E. 246)." Bennett v. Bainbridge Farm Co., 173 Ga. 856 ( 162 S.E. 134). The document in the present record purporting to be a bill of exceptions, and properly certified by the trial judge, is not signed by the plaintiffs in error or their counsel.

Writ of error dismissed. All the Justices concur.

No. 13938. NOVEMBER 13, 1941.


Summaries of

Kyle v. Huiet

Supreme Court of Georgia
Nov 13, 1941
17 S.E.2d 745 (Ga. 1941)
Case details for

Kyle v. Huiet

Case Details

Full title:KYLE et al. v. HUIET, commissioner of labor, et al

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Nov 13, 1941

Citations

17 S.E.2d 745 (Ga. 1941)
193 Ga. 202

Citing Cases

Strange v. Sloman

Accordingly, the two signatures of counsel, one following the notice of intention to present "a bill of…