From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kyle v. Cal. Victim Comp. Bd.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 27, 2021
2:21-cv-0479 KJM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 27, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-0479 KJM KJN P

08-27-2021

DONTA LADEAL KYLE, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA VICTIM COMPENSATION BOARD, ET AL., Defendants.


FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

KENDALL J. NEWMAN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On June 7, 2021, the district court dismissed plaintiff's complaint with leave to amend, granting plaintiff sixty days in which to file an amended complaint. Sixty days from that date have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Kyle v. Cal. Victim Comp. Bd.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 27, 2021
2:21-cv-0479 KJM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 27, 2021)
Case details for

Kyle v. Cal. Victim Comp. Bd.

Case Details

Full title:DONTA LADEAL KYLE, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA VICTIM COMPENSATION BOARD, ET…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Aug 27, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-0479 KJM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 27, 2021)