From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kwasniewski v. Bultinck

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District. Second Division
Jun 12, 1963
42 Ill. App. 2d 335 (Ill. App. Ct. 1963)

Summary

distinguishing replevin from detinue

Summary of this case from Relational Funding Corp. v. Siemens Business Comm. Sys.

Opinion

Gen. No. 48,868. (Abstract of Decision.)

June 12, 1963.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. WILLIAM J. TUOHY, Judge, presiding. Order affirmed.

Anna D. Marek, of Ontarioville, for defendant, Keeneyville Garage;

Robert L. Huttner, of Chicago, for appellee.


Not to be published in full.


Summaries of

Kwasniewski v. Bultinck

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District. Second Division
Jun 12, 1963
42 Ill. App. 2d 335 (Ill. App. Ct. 1963)

distinguishing replevin from detinue

Summary of this case from Relational Funding Corp. v. Siemens Business Comm. Sys.
Case details for

Kwasniewski v. Bultinck

Case Details

Full title:Helen Kwasniewski, Appellee, v. Gabriel Bultinck, et al., Appellants. On…

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, First District. Second Division

Date published: Jun 12, 1963

Citations

42 Ill. App. 2d 335 (Ill. App. Ct. 1963)
192 N.E.2d 436

Citing Cases

Relational Funding Corp. v. Siemens Business Comm. Sys.

But since by replevin it is taken from the defendant before the right is finally determined, a bond is…

CCA Fin. LLC v. Time Savers, Inc.

As Defendant points out, the major difference between the two remedies is a matter of timing: in replevin,…