From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kuy v. Lynch

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 17, 2016
Case No. CV 16-00481 BRO (RAO) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. CV 16-00481 BRO (RAO)

08-17-2016

BUNRATH KUY, Petitioner, v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, et al., Respondents.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the records and files herein, and the Magistrate Judge's Superseding Report and Recommendation. The time for filing Objections to the Superseding Report and Recommendation has passed and no Objections have been received. Accordingly, the Court accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition is denied, and Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action as moot. DATED: August 17, 2016

/s/_________

BEVERLY REID O'CONNELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Kuy v. Lynch

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 17, 2016
Case No. CV 16-00481 BRO (RAO) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2016)
Case details for

Kuy v. Lynch

Case Details

Full title:BUNRATH KUY, Petitioner, v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 17, 2016

Citations

Case No. CV 16-00481 BRO (RAO) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2016)