From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kutterer v. Solano Cnty. Jail

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 9, 2021
2:21-cv-0772 DB P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-0772 DB P

12-09-2021

MARCUS KUTTERER, Plaintiff, v. SOLANO COUNTY JAIL, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

DEBORAH BARNES, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff is a county jail inmate proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that he was subjected to sexual harassment based on a comment made by defendant.

By order dated August 25, 2021 the first amended complaint was screened and dismissed. (ECF No. 11.) Plaintiff was given thirty days leave to file an amended complaint and warned that failure to file an amended complaint would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Id.) Those thirty days have passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or requested additional time to file an amended complaint.

Plaintiff h as, however, filed a notice regarding phone access (ECF No. 13) and a request to be placed on a list for “proper civil phone calls” (ECF No. 14). In both filings plaintiff requests to be placed on a list so th at h e can m ake an d receive phone calls regarding his mental h ealt h care. Because his request is unrelated to his underlying claim in this action, it will be denied. Plaintiff is advised to seek relief through his facility's administrative appeals process. Additionally, in light of plaintiff's pro se status, the court will grant plaintiff an additional thirty days to file an amended complaint.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's request for placem en t on a list to receive phone calls (ECF No. 14) is denied.

2. Within thirty days of the date of this order plaintiff shall file an amended compliant that complies with the requirements of the Civil Rights Act, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Local Rules of Practice. The amended complaint must bear the docket number assigned to this case and must be labeled “First Amended Complaint.”

3. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.


Summaries of

Kutterer v. Solano Cnty. Jail

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 9, 2021
2:21-cv-0772 DB P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2021)
Case details for

Kutterer v. Solano Cnty. Jail

Case Details

Full title:MARCUS KUTTERER, Plaintiff, v. SOLANO COUNTY JAIL, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Dec 9, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-0772 DB P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2021)