Kutsak v. Herschitz

Full title: LEONID KUTSAK, Appellant, v. IZAK HERSCHITZ, Respondent, et al., Defendant

Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 22, 1998

251 A.D.2d 550 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

673 N.Y.S.2d 928

Opinion

June 22, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bellard, J.).

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly concluded that the continuous treatment doctrine was inapplicable under the circumstances presented (see, CPLR 214-a; Young v. New York City Health Hosps. Corp., 91 N.Y.2d 291; cf., Cox v. Kingsboro Med. Group, 88 N.Y.2d 904; Nykorchuck v. Henriques, 78 N.Y.2d 255, 259; Massie v. Crawford, 78 N.Y.2d 516, 519; Fauci v. Wolan, 238 A.D.2d 305).

Copertino, J. P., Thompson, Sullivan and Friedmann, JJ., concur.