From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kuta v. Kaminsky

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Jan 17, 2012
363 S.W.3d 134 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. ED 96724.

2012-01-17

Randall KUTA, Appellant, v. Sherry KAMINSKY, et al., Respondents.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Patrick Clifford, Judge.Kenneth J. Heinz, Clayton, MO, for Appellant. James D. Maschoff, Brian M. Wacker, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent.


Supreme Court Denied Feb. 23, 2012.

Application for Transfer Denied

May 1, 2012.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Patrick Clifford, Judge.Kenneth J. Heinz, Clayton, MO, for Appellant. James D. Maschoff, Brian M. Wacker, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent.

Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., ROY L. RICHTER, J., and GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Randall Kuta, doing business as Lifetyme Exteriors, (“Plaintiff”) appeals from the trial court's judgment, directing a verdict in favor of defendants Sheri Kaminsky, Oscar Hantz, and Don Anderson, doing business as Anderson Building Co., and against Plaintiff on Plaintiff's Petition for Damages. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Kuta v. Kaminsky

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Jan 17, 2012
363 S.W.3d 134 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Kuta v. Kaminsky

Case Details

Full title:Randall KUTA, Appellant, v. Sherry KAMINSKY, et al., Respondents.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Date published: Jan 17, 2012

Citations

363 S.W.3d 134 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)