From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kuskie v. Saif

Oregon Court of Appeals
Aug 1, 1977
566 P.2d 1226 (Or. Ct. App. 1977)

Opinion

No. 77 0028, CA 7781

Argued July 19, 1977

Affirmed August 1, 1977

Appeal from Circuit Court, Lane County.

Edwin E. Allen, Judge.

J. W. McCracken, Jr., Eugene, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Kevin L. Mannix, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were James A. Redden, Attorney General, W. Michael Gillette, Solicitor General, and Glenda L. Green, Certified Law Student, Salem.


Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Lee and Tanzer, Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.


In this worker's compensation case claimant contends that his condition has worsened in such a manner and to such degree as to warrant reopening his claim for aggravation. The triers of fact who preceded us in hearing this case held to the contrary. The issue is purely one of fact and we can usefully say no more than that our review of the evidence leads us to agree.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Kuskie v. Saif

Oregon Court of Appeals
Aug 1, 1977
566 P.2d 1226 (Or. Ct. App. 1977)
Case details for

Kuskie v. Saif

Case Details

Full title:KUSKIE, Appellant, v. STATE ACCIDENT INSURANCE FUND, Respondent

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Aug 1, 1977

Citations

566 P.2d 1226 (Or. Ct. App. 1977)
566 P.2d 1226

Citing Cases

Plunk v. Saif

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Kuskie v. SAIF, 30 Or. App. 323, 566 P.2d 1226 (1977).…