From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kushmaul v. Consumers Power Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals
Jun 28, 1966
143 N.W.2d 154 (Mich. Ct. App. 1966)

Opinion

Docket No. 1,124.

Decided June 28, 1966.

Appeal from Saginaw; Borchard (Fred J.), J. Submitted Division 2 May 10, 1966, at Lansing. (Docket No. 1,124.) Decided June 28, 1966.

Complaint by William D. Kushmaul, special administrator of estate of William Duane Kushmaul II, deceased, against Consumers Power Company and Frank J. Knight Company for wrongful death of the deceased son of plaintiff. Accelerated judgment for defendants. Plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

van Benschoten van Benschoten, for plaintiff.

Stanton, Taylor, McGraw Collison ( Ralph B. Taylor, of counsel), for defendant Frank J. Knight Company.

Smith, Brooker, Harvey Cook ( Carl H. Smith, of counsel) and S.H. Redner, for defendant Consumers Power Company.


April 22, 1959, plaintiff's 2-year-old son was struck by a train of Chesapeake Ohio Railway Company and was instantly killed. The accident occurred on the tracks of Chesapeake Ohio Railway Company near plaintiff's home in Saginaw township, Saginaw county. March 18, 1961, plaintiff commenced an action against the railway company under the wrongful death act, CL 1948, §§ 691.581 and 691.582 (Stat Ann §§ 27.711 and 27.712). Sometime after November 23, 1964, and in discovery proceedings in the action against the railway company, plaintiff learned that in 1958 defendant Knight Company made a contract with Chesapeake Ohio Railway Company to install a gas main under its tracks and defendant Consumers Power Company then made a contract with Knight Company to provide the labor and materials required for such installation. April 14, 1965, plaintiff filed the present action under the wrongful death act, CLS 1961, § 600.2922 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 27A.2922), claiming that in performing these contracts defendants knocked down the right-of-way fence of the railway company; that by failing to put the fence back up, defendants violated their contracts; and plaintiff's son got on the tracks because the fence was down. Plaintiff claimed his decedent was a third-party beneficiary under the Chesapeake Ohio — Knight — Consumers contracts and pleaded in contract. Defendants moved for accelerated judgment on the basis the 3-year statute of limitations, CLS 1961, § 600.5805 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 27A.5805), applied and the action was barred. The trial court granted the motion and plaintiff appeals on the basis that the 3-year statute of limitations is not applicable to this case.

GCR 1963, 116. — REPORTER.

In view of Coates v. Milner Hotels, Inc. (1945), 311 Mich. 233; Baatz v. Smith (1960), 361 Mich. 68; Coury v. General Motors Corporation (1965), 376 Mich. 248, it is the opinion of this Court that the trial court properly granted the motion for accelerated judgment.

Affirmed, with costs to appellees.

McGREGOR, P.J., and BURNS, J., concurred.


Summaries of

Kushmaul v. Consumers Power Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals
Jun 28, 1966
143 N.W.2d 154 (Mich. Ct. App. 1966)
Case details for

Kushmaul v. Consumers Power Co.

Case Details

Full title:KUSHMAUL v. CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY

Court:Michigan Court of Appeals

Date published: Jun 28, 1966

Citations

143 N.W.2d 154 (Mich. Ct. App. 1966)
143 N.W.2d 154

Citing Cases

Szlinis v. Moulded Fiber Glass Co.

MCLA § 600.5805 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 27A.5805), the three-year statute of limitations, applies to wrongful…

Rhule v. Armstrong

On appeal, plaintiff contends the three-year statute of limitations does not apply, and, if it does, it is…