From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kurtz v. State

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Jun 15, 2015
NO. 03-15-00144-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 15, 2015)

Opinion

NO. 03-15-00144-CR

06-15-2015

Christopher Arthur Kurtz, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee


FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY
NO. CR2014-343, HONORABLE JACK H. ROBISON, JUDGE PRESIDING
ORDER FOR CLERK TO PROVIDE APPELLATE RECORD TO APPELLANT

PER CURIAM

Appellant's court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a brief concluding that the instant appeal is frivolous and without merit. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Appellant's counsel has certified to the Court that he provided copies of the motion and brief to appellant, advised appellant of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response, and supplied appellant with a form motion for pro se access to the appellate record. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319-20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). Appellant has timely filed the motion requesting access to the appellate record with this Court.

Appellant's pro se motion is granted. We hereby direct the clerk of the trial court to provide a copy of the reporter's record and clerk's record to appellant, and to provide written verification to this Court of the date and manner in which the appellate record was provided, on or before June 25, 2015. See id. at 321.

It is ordered on June 15, 2015. Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Goodwin and Field Do Not Publish


Summaries of

Kurtz v. State

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Jun 15, 2015
NO. 03-15-00144-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 15, 2015)
Case details for

Kurtz v. State

Case Details

Full title:Christopher Arthur Kurtz, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

Court:TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

Date published: Jun 15, 2015

Citations

NO. 03-15-00144-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 15, 2015)