From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kurtz v. Ferrante

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1935
243 App. Div. 739 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Opinion

February, 1935.


Order granting defendants' motion to vacate deficiency judgment and providing for the entry of a new judgment, if in fact there be a deficiency, when the actual value of the mortgaged premises is determined, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. (1) Assuming that the situation does not come within the statute, the right to afford the relief accorded to the defendants is within the inherent power of the court under the facts and circumstances disclosed herein. ( Monaghan v. May, 242 App. Div. 64.) (2) This view obtains independently of the possible propriety of holding that the statute is applicable, under the doctrine of Westchester Trust Co. v. Fox ( 243 App. Div. 582). Lazansky, P.J., Young, Carswell, Scudder and Johnston, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kurtz v. Ferrante

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1935
243 App. Div. 739 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)
Case details for

Kurtz v. Ferrante

Case Details

Full title:HENRY KURTZ and Another, Appellants, v. GASPARE FERRANTE and Another…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 1, 1935

Citations

243 App. Div. 739 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Citing Cases

Home Owners' Loan Corporation v. Wood

We hold that this court has the power to determine the manner and the time when the determination as to a…

Griffo v. Swartz

We hold that this court has the power to determine the manner and the time when the determination as to a…