From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kurth v. Holston

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Oct 27, 2011
Case No. 2:11-cv-01638-JCM-PAL (D. Nev. Oct. 27, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 2:11-cv-01638-JCM-PAL

10-27-2011

ERIC KURTH, Plaintiff, v. LEANDER B. HOLSTON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

This matter is before the court on Plaintiff's failure to file a Certificate as to Interested Parties as required by LR 7.1-1. The Complaint (Dkt. #1) in this matter was filed October 11, 2011. No Answer has been filed. LR 7.1-1(a) requires, unless otherwise ordered, that in all cases (except habeas corpus cases) pro se litigants and counsel for private parties shall, upon entering a case, identify in the disclosure statement required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 all persons, associations of persons, firms, partnerships or corporations (including parent corporations) which have a direct, pecuniary interest in the outcome of the case. LR 7.1-1(b) further states that if there are no known interested parties, other than those participating in the case, a statement to that effect must be filed. Additionally, LR 7.1-1(c) requires a party to promptly file a supplemental certification upon any change in the information that this rule requires. To date, Plaintiff has failed to comply. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED Plaintiff shall file his Certificate as to Interested Parties, which fully complies with LR 7.1-1 no later than 4:00 p.m., November 10, 2011. Failure to comply may result in the issuance of an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed.

Peggy A. Leen

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Kurth v. Holston

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Oct 27, 2011
Case No. 2:11-cv-01638-JCM-PAL (D. Nev. Oct. 27, 2011)
Case details for

Kurth v. Holston

Case Details

Full title:ERIC KURTH, Plaintiff, v. LEANDER B. HOLSTON, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Oct 27, 2011

Citations

Case No. 2:11-cv-01638-JCM-PAL (D. Nev. Oct. 27, 2011)