From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kurgan v. Trimble

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 29, 2012
CASE NO. 1:11-cv-01166-GBC (PC) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:11-cv-01166-GBC (PC)

11-29-2012

JAMES KURGAN, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN TRIMBLE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH

PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO STATE A

CLAIM

Plaintiff James Kurgan (Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed his original complaint on July 15, 2011. Doc. 1. On October 22, 2012, the Court dismissed the action and required Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within thirty days. Doc. 6. Plaintiff was warned that if he failed to file an amended complaint in compliance with the order, this action would be dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to state any claims.

More than thirty days have passed and Plaintiff has not complied with or otherwise responded to the Court's order. As a result, there is no pleading on file which sets forth any claims upon which relief may be granted.

Accordingly, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), the Court HEREBY ORDERS that:

1. this action is DISMISSED, with prejudice, based on Plaintiff's failure to state any claims upon which relief may be granted (Doc. 1; Doc. 6); and
2. The Clerk's Office is directed to enter judgment against Plaintiff.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Kurgan v. Trimble

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 29, 2012
CASE NO. 1:11-cv-01166-GBC (PC) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2012)
Case details for

Kurgan v. Trimble

Case Details

Full title:JAMES KURGAN, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN TRIMBLE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 29, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 1:11-cv-01166-GBC (PC) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2012)