From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kuoha v. Equifirst Corporation

United States District Court, S.D. California
Jul 24, 2009
CASE NO. 09cv1100 WQH (WMc) (S.D. Cal. Jul. 24, 2009)

Opinion

CASE NO. 09cv1100 WQH (WMc).

July 24, 2009


ORDER


On May 20, 2009, Plaintiffs Samuel Kuoha and Dana Kuoha filed a Complaint and Plaintiff Samuel Kuoha filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (Doc. # 1-2). On July 8, 2009, the Court denied the Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (Doc. # 3). The Court stated that this case would be closed unless Plaintiffs either paid the requisite $350 filing fee, or each submitted a more detailed motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. # 3 at 2).

On July 16, 2009, Defendant Equifirst Corporation filed an Amended Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint. (Doc. # 9). Also on July 16, 2009, Defendants Homecomings Financial and ETS Services, LLC filed a Motion to Dismiss. (Doc. # 10).

The Amended Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint (Doc. # 9) replaced the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint filed by Defendant Equifirst Corporation on July 15, 2009 (Doc. # 4).

On July 21, 2009, Plaintiffs paid the $350 filing fee. (Doc. # 13).

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, no later than August 17, 2009, Plaintiff may file a response to Equifirst Corporation's Amended Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint (Doc. # 9) and Homecomings Financial and ETS Services, LLC's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 10). No later than August 24, 2009, Defendants may file a reply to Plaintiffs' response. There will be no oral argument or hearing on the motions.


Summaries of

Kuoha v. Equifirst Corporation

United States District Court, S.D. California
Jul 24, 2009
CASE NO. 09cv1100 WQH (WMc) (S.D. Cal. Jul. 24, 2009)
Case details for

Kuoha v. Equifirst Corporation

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL and DANA KUOHA, Plaintiffs, v. EQUIFIRST CORPORATION; HOMECOMINGS…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. California

Date published: Jul 24, 2009

Citations

CASE NO. 09cv1100 WQH (WMc) (S.D. Cal. Jul. 24, 2009)

Citing Cases

Curtis v. Option One Mortgage Corp.

The courts to examine this issue have found that from its plan language, Section 2923.6 does not grant any…

Curtis v. Option One Mortgage Corp.

The courts that have examined this issue have found that from its plain language, Section 2923.6 does not…