From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kunst v. Kunst

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 15, 1989
551 So. 2d 522 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. 88-2226.

September 5, 1989. Rehearing Denied November 15, 1989.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Monroe County; Henry F. Martin, Judge.

Barry R. Kunst, in pro. per.

Cullen Thomas and Russell Cullen, for appellee.

Before BASKIN, JORGENSON, and COPE, JJ.


The trial court's order determining custody was supported by substantial, competent evidence. Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm. Richardson v. Richardson, 442 So.2d 1005 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). This affirmance is without prejudice to either party's right to return to the trial court to seek partition of the jointly owned real property, or to have the trial court determine each party's financial responsibility for expenses and entitlement to profits relating to that property.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Kunst v. Kunst

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 15, 1989
551 So. 2d 522 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

Kunst v. Kunst

Case Details

Full title:BARRY R. KUNST, APPELLANT, v. KERRI BOCK KUNST, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Nov 15, 1989

Citations

551 So. 2d 522 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Citing Cases

Brago v. Brago

That determination is supported by competent substantial evidence. See Kunst v. Kunst, 551 So.2d 522 (Fla. 3d…