From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kunsella v. Frederick L. Cranford-Charles H Locher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 1, 1932
235 App. Div. 618 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)

Opinion

January, 1932.

Present — Finch, P.J., Merrell, McAvoy, Martin and Sherman, JJ.


Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals or for a reargument denied, with ten dollars costs. Motion for a stay granted upon appellant's filing the undertaking required by section 593 of the Civil Practice Act.


Summaries of

Kunsella v. Frederick L. Cranford-Charles H Locher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 1, 1932
235 App. Div. 618 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)
Case details for

Kunsella v. Frederick L. Cranford-Charles H Locher

Case Details

Full title:LEE MILLER KUNSELLA, Formerely LEE MILLER, an Infant, etc., v. FREDERICK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1932

Citations

235 App. Div. 618 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)