From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kuniholm v. Kuniholm

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 1, 1962
15 A.D.2d 736 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)

Opinion

February 1, 1962


Motion for reargument denied but motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted to the extent of certifying the following question: "Did the Appellate Division err in affirming the order of Special Term denying plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment pursuant to rule 114 of the Rules of Civil Practice?" Settle order on notice.

Concur — McNally, J.P., Stevens, Eager, Steuer and Bastow, JJ.


Summaries of

Kuniholm v. Kuniholm

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 1, 1962
15 A.D.2d 736 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)
Case details for

Kuniholm v. Kuniholm

Case Details

Full title:BERTHE E. KUNIHOLM v. BERTEL E. KUNIHOLM

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 1, 1962

Citations

15 A.D.2d 736 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)