From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kumaran v. ADM Inv'r Servs.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 18, 2022
1:20-cv-3873-GHW (S.D.N.Y. May. 18, 2022)

Opinion

1:20-cv-3873-GHW

05-18-2022

SAMANTHA SIVA KUMARAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ADM INVESTOR SERVICES, INC., Defendant.


ORDER

GREGORY H. WOODS, United States District Judge:

Joel MacMull's application to discuss his request to withdraw from this matter with the Court ex parte, Dkt. No. 136, is denied. Motions to withdraw as counsel must be made pursuant to Local Rule 1.4. If Mr. MacMull wishes to withdraw, the Court expects that any application under Local Rule 1.4 will initially rely solely upon information that can be disclosed publicly. If the motion does not provide sufficient information for the Court to evaluate the request, the Court may invite an ex parte communication. If Mr. MacMull submits a motion to withdraw by May 19, 2022, the Court will take up the motion at the teleconference scheduled for May 20, 2022 at 3:00 p.m.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Kumaran v. ADM Inv'r Servs.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 18, 2022
1:20-cv-3873-GHW (S.D.N.Y. May. 18, 2022)
Case details for

Kumaran v. ADM Inv'r Servs.

Case Details

Full title:SAMANTHA SIVA KUMARAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ADM INVESTOR SERVICES, INC.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: May 18, 2022

Citations

1:20-cv-3873-GHW (S.D.N.Y. May. 18, 2022)