From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kulo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Mar 23, 2012
83 So. 3d 979 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. 5D11–2318.

2012-03-23

John Mark KULO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Gail Adams, Judge.James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Michael S. Becker, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. John Kulo, Jasper, pro se.


Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Gail Adams, Judge.James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Michael S. Becker, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. John Kulo, Jasper, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.PER CURIAM.

We affirm in all respects. We remand, however, for correction of a scrivener's error. The order reflects that the appellant violated conditions of probation 6 and 8. The record demonstrates, however, that he was found to have violated condition 5 and a special condition concerning attendance at AA meetings. The order on remand should be corrected as indicated.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

PALMER, MONACO and TORPY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kulo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Mar 23, 2012
83 So. 3d 979 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Kulo v. State

Case Details

Full title:John Mark KULO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Date published: Mar 23, 2012

Citations

83 So. 3d 979 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)