From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kulla v. U.S.

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Sep 15, 2011
1:10CV897 (M.D.N.C. Sep. 15, 2011)

Opinion

1:10CV897.

September 15, 2011


ORDER


On November 19, 2010, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed, and notice was served on Plaintiff, and a copy was given to the court.

Within the time limitation set forth in the statute, Plaintiff objected to the Recommendation.

The court has appropriately reviewed the portions of the Magistrate Judge's report to which objection was made and has made a de novo determination which is in accord with the Magistrate Judge's report. The court hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action be dismissed sua sponte without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a civil complaint, on the proper Motion for Return of Property forms, which corrects the defects cited in the Recommendation. A judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order.


Summaries of

Kulla v. U.S.

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Sep 15, 2011
1:10CV897 (M.D.N.C. Sep. 15, 2011)
Case details for

Kulla v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:BEDRI KULLA, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Date published: Sep 15, 2011

Citations

1:10CV897 (M.D.N.C. Sep. 15, 2011)