Opinion
22-55750
10-18-2022
R. J. KULICK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT, Central District of CA, Northern Division; HOWARD I. CAMHI; JEFF F. TCHAKAROV; MICHELMAN AND ROBINSON, LLC; DOES, 1-100, inclusive, Defendants-Appellees.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Appeal from the United States District Court No. 2:22-cv-01032-SB-SK for the Central District of California Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr., District Judge, Presiding
Before: SILVERMAN, GRABER, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM
R.J. Kulick appeals pro se from the district court's order dismissing without prejudice for lack of prosecution his action alleging various federal and state law claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.
In his opening brief, Kulick fails to address the grounds for dismissal of his action and has therefore waived his challenge to the district court's dismissal of his action. See Indep. Towers of Wash. v. Washington, 350 F.3d 925, 929 (9th Cir. 2003) ("[W]e will not consider any claims that were not actually argued in appellant's opening brief."); Acosta-Huerta v. Estelle, 7 F.3d 139, 144 (9th Cir. 1993) (issues not supported by argument in a pro se appellant's opening brief are waived).
AFFIRMED.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).