Opinion
19CV 8403 (VB)
05-17-2022
ORDER
VINCENT L. BRICCETTI, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
By letter filed with the Court May 16, 2022, plaintiff, proceeding pro se, provides information to the Court regarding his private communications with defendant Rushmore Loan Management Services LLC. It is not clear what relief (if any) plaintiff seeks from the Court.
Plaintiffs letter is dated May 16, 2021, which the Court construes as an error.
To the extent that plaintiff intends his May 16, 2022, letter to supplement his opposition to defendants' motion for summary judgment or his reply in support of his motion for summary judgment, plaintiffs request is DENIED. As the Court has previously advised plaintiff, prior permission from the Court is required pursuant to Paragraph 2.C of Judge Briccetti's Individual Practices before a party may file a sur-reply.
Plaintiff is directed to communicate directly with defendant Rushmore Loan Management Services LLC to the extent he has questions about correspondence with Rushmore Loan Management Services LLC.
SO ORDERED: