From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kuhl v. U.S. Bank Tr.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 17, 2022
19CV 8403 (VB) (S.D.N.Y. May. 17, 2022)

Opinion

19CV 8403 (VB)

05-17-2022

JONATHAN KUHL, Plaintiff, v. U.S. BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, not in its individual Capacity but solely as Owner Trustee for legacy Mortgage Asset Trust 2018GS-1 and RUSHMORE LOAN MANAGEMENT' SERVICES LLC, Defendants.


ORDER

VINCENT L. BRICCETTI, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

By letter filed with the Court May 16, 2022, plaintiff, proceeding pro se, provides information to the Court regarding his private communications with defendant Rushmore Loan Management Services LLC. It is not clear what relief (if any) plaintiff seeks from the Court.

Plaintiffs letter is dated May 16, 2021, which the Court construes as an error.

To the extent that plaintiff intends his May 16, 2022, letter to supplement his opposition to defendants' motion for summary judgment or his reply in support of his motion for summary judgment, plaintiffs request is DENIED. As the Court has previously advised plaintiff, prior permission from the Court is required pursuant to Paragraph 2.C of Judge Briccetti's Individual Practices before a party may file a sur-reply.

Plaintiff is directed to communicate directly with defendant Rushmore Loan Management Services LLC to the extent he has questions about correspondence with Rushmore Loan Management Services LLC.

SO ORDERED:


Summaries of

Kuhl v. U.S. Bank Tr.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 17, 2022
19CV 8403 (VB) (S.D.N.Y. May. 17, 2022)
Case details for

Kuhl v. U.S. Bank Tr.

Case Details

Full title:JONATHAN KUHL, Plaintiff, v. U.S. BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, not in…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: May 17, 2022

Citations

19CV 8403 (VB) (S.D.N.Y. May. 17, 2022)