From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kuebler v. Jaime

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Mar 23, 2016
645 F. App'x 548 (9th Cir. 2016)

Opinion

No. 14-55446

03-23-2016

GREGORY JAMES KUEBLER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DR. JAIME; DR. TRAN, Defendants - Appellees.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

D.C. No. 5:11-cv-01983-DMG-OP MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California
Dolly M. Gee, District Judge, Presiding Before: GOODWIN, LEAVY, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Former California state prisoner Gregory James Kuebler appeals pro se from the district court's summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion the district court's rulings concerning discovery. Preminger v. Peake, 552 F.3d 757, 768 n.10 (9th Cir. 2008). We vacate and remand.

The magistrate judge denied Kuebler's requests for subpoenas. However, "[t]he clerk must issue a subpoena, signed but otherwise in blank, to a party that requests it." Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(a)(3). Although generally "a party who fails to file timely objections to a magistrate judge's nondispositive order . . . forfeits [the] right to appellate review of that order," Simpson v. Lear Astronics Corp., 77 F.3d 1170, 1174 (9th Cir. 1996), we retain discretion to review such an order if "the issue presented is purely one of law and either does not depend on the factual record developed below, or the pertinent record has been fully developed," Bastidas v. Chappell, 791 F.3d 1155, 1161 (9th Cir. 2015) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). We exercise that discretion here.

Based on the record before us, we cannot conclude that the magistrate judge's error was harmless. See generally Tagupa v. Bd. of Directors, 633 F.2d 1309, 1312 (9th Cir. 1980) (appeal of discovery order is subject to harmless error analysis). Accordingly, we vacate the judgment and remand for further proceedings consistent with this disposition.

The parties shall bear their own costs on appeal.

VACATED and REMANDED.


Summaries of

Kuebler v. Jaime

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Mar 23, 2016
645 F. App'x 548 (9th Cir. 2016)
Case details for

Kuebler v. Jaime

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY JAMES KUEBLER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DR. JAIME; DR. TRAN…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Mar 23, 2016

Citations

645 F. App'x 548 (9th Cir. 2016)