From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

KUCKER BRUH, LLP v. HORING, WELIKSON ROSEN

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 15, 2005
2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 52053 (N.Y. App. Term 2005)

Opinion

570662/05.

Decided December 15, 2005.

Defendant appeals and plaintiff cross-appeals from an order of the Civil Court, New York County (Donna G. Recant, J.), entered on or about September 27, 2004, which denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and granted defendant's cross motion for summary judgment to the extent of directing plaintiff to serve and file an amended summons and complaint upon a "necessary" party.

Order (Donna G. Recant, J.), entered on or about September 27, 2004, reversed, with $10 costs, and plaintiff's motion for summary judgment granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of plaintiff in the amount of $10,000.

PRESENT: McCooe, J.P., Davis, Gangel-Jacob, JJ.


In settlement of a summary eviction proceeding, a stipulation was entered into by the plaintiff law firm on behalf of the tenant, and the defendant law firm on behalf of the landlord, which provided in part:

The petitioner agrees to deposit $10,000 in the escrow account of petitioner's counsel on or before December 1, 2003. The monies shall be released to the respondent's counsel, Kucker Bruh, LLP, as attorneys, upon the respondent's surrender.

The tenant timely surrendered the apartment but defendant paid the money to the tenant personally rather than to plaintiff, who now sues defendant to recover $10,000, the amount of the escrow funds.

Plaintiff had a beneficial interest in the escrow fund and the clear language of the settlement required defendant to deliver the fund to plaintiff, which it admittedly failed to do ( see National Union Fire Ins. Co. v. Proskauer Rose Goetz Mendelson, 165 Misc 2d 539, affd 227 AD2d 106).

Plaintiff's retainer agreement with the tenant provided that its fee shall be one-third of any recovery, which includes money "paid to you as well as any waiver of money that you owe." This total exceeded $35,000.00. Accordingly, we award plaintiff a recovery of $10,000, the amount held in escrow.

The tenant is not a necessary party to this action since complete relief may be accorded between the parties herein and the tenant's interest will not be prejudiced or affected by a judgment in this action ( see CPLR 1001 [a]).

We have considered defendant's remaining arguments and find them lacking in merit.

This constitutes the decision and order of the court.


Summaries of

KUCKER BRUH, LLP v. HORING, WELIKSON ROSEN

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 15, 2005
2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 52053 (N.Y. App. Term 2005)
Case details for

KUCKER BRUH, LLP v. HORING, WELIKSON ROSEN

Case Details

Full title:KUCKER BRUH, LLP, Plaintiff-Respondent-Cross-Appellant, v. HORING…

Court:Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 15, 2005

Citations

2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 52053 (N.Y. App. Term 2005)
809 N.Y.S.2d 482