From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kubota v. Patterson

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
May 20, 2005
No. CA-3:05-CV-0908-H (N.D. Tex. May. 20, 2005)

Opinion

No. CA-3:05-CV-0908-H.

May 20, 2005


ORDER


Before the Court are the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, filed May 16, 2005, and Plaintiff's Notice, filed May 20, 2005, which the Court treats as Objections.

The Court has made the required independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case; the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge and Plaintiff's Objections. Having done so, the Court is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are ADOPTED as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court, and Plaintiff's Objections are OVERRULED.

It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED and the complaint will be dismissed without notice, unless within ten (10) days of the date of this Order Plaintiff tenders the $250.00 filing fee made payable to the United States District Clerk.

It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Kubota v. Patterson

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
May 20, 2005
No. CA-3:05-CV-0908-H (N.D. Tex. May. 20, 2005)
Case details for

Kubota v. Patterson

Case Details

Full title:JAMES KUBOTA Plaintiff v. JUDGE JAY PATTERSON, et al. Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division

Date published: May 20, 2005

Citations

No. CA-3:05-CV-0908-H (N.D. Tex. May. 20, 2005)