From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kubota Credit Corproation, U.S.A. v. Fed. Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 2, 2012
CASE NO. CV 10-2521-GHK (PJWx) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 2, 2012)

Summary

construing the same exclusion at issue here, noting "the plain meaning of ‘authorized representative’ ... only requires a grant of ‘authority,’ not necessarily a grant of ‘fiscal authority’ "

Summary of this case from C.S. McCrossan Inc. v. Fed. Ins. Co.

Opinion

CASE NO. CV 10-2521-GHK (PJWx)

04-02-2012

Kubota Credit Corproation, U.S.A., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Federal Insurance Company, Defendant.


JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the Court's April 2, 2012 Order, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that Plaintiffs Kubota Credit Corporation, U.S.A. and Kubota Tractor Corporation's ("Plaintiffs") claims against Defendant Federal Insurance Company are DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiffs shall take nothing by this Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

GEORGE H. KING

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Kubota Credit Corproation, U.S.A. v. Fed. Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 2, 2012
CASE NO. CV 10-2521-GHK (PJWx) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 2, 2012)

construing the same exclusion at issue here, noting "the plain meaning of ‘authorized representative’ ... only requires a grant of ‘authority,’ not necessarily a grant of ‘fiscal authority’ "

Summary of this case from C.S. McCrossan Inc. v. Fed. Ins. Co.
Case details for

Kubota Credit Corproation, U.S.A. v. Fed. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:Kubota Credit Corproation, U.S.A., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Federal…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 2, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. CV 10-2521-GHK (PJWx) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 2, 2012)

Citing Cases

C.S. McCrossan Inc. v. Fed. Ins. Co.

The exclusion applies to acts committed by "any authorized representative," not just authorized…