From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kubiniec v. Mahoney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 4, 1983
97 A.D.2d 981 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Opinion

November 4, 1983

Appeal from the Erie Supreme Court, Kane, J.

Present — Hancock, Jr., J.P., Doerr, Boomer, Moule and Schnepp, JJ. (Order entered Oct. 18, 1983.)


Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner, the Republican, Conservative and Liberal candidate, appeals from an order of Supreme Court, Erie County, dismissing his petition to enjoin the Erie County Board of Elections from conducting a drawing to determine ballot placement for the position of Associate Judge of the City Court of Buffalo. The court also vacated the temporary restraining order against the board and ordered, as soon as practicable, a drawing for ballot position to be held between the two Democratic candidates for the position. The board improperly allowed petitioner, a Republican candidate, to participate in the drawing for ballot position. Row A candidates are entitled to have their order on the ballot determined prior to the ordering of all other candidates (see Matter of Mintz v Cuomo, 45 N.Y.2d 918). Inasmuch as no objection was raised by the row A candidates to the court's order for a new drawing, we do not address this point. Contrary to petitioner's contention, he acquired no rights through operation of waiver or estoppel as a result of the unauthorized and improper drawing ( Matter of Gavigan v McCoy, 37 N.Y.2d 548, 552; Matter of McLaughlin v Berle, 71 A.D.2d 707, 708).


Summaries of

Kubiniec v. Mahoney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 4, 1983
97 A.D.2d 981 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)
Case details for

Kubiniec v. Mahoney

Case Details

Full title:JULIAN F. KUBINIEC, Appellant, v. EDWARD J. MAHONEY et al., Constituting…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 4, 1983

Citations

97 A.D.2d 981 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Citing Cases

Matter of Ramirez v. Colon

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. We do not agree with the petitioner's…