From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kubick v. Kubick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 25, 1999
261 A.D.2d 300 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

May 25, 1999

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen Bransten, J.).


No appeal lies from the denial of a motion to resettle the decretal paragraphs of a judgment ( Hatsis v. Hatsis, 122 A.D.2d 111). Were we to consider the matter on the merits, we would affirm. The parties' stipulation of settlement entered upon the record expressly stated, "[T]he holidays, and holiday recess schedule will be submitted with the judgment for divorce". The schedule prepared by plaintiff wife substantially complies with the outline placed upon the record and the proposed schedule that the court directed the parties to incorporate by order dated December 19, 1997, and does not vary or contradict either the express terms of the stipulation or the intention of the parties as outlined therein. The balance of the provisions is likewise in accordance with language of the stipulation as set forth upon the record, and, accordingly, we find no merit to defendant's arguments on appeal.

Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Rosenberger, Williams, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.


Summaries of

Kubick v. Kubick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 25, 1999
261 A.D.2d 300 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Kubick v. Kubick

Case Details

Full title:BONNIE B. KUBICK, Respondent, v. JOHN KUBICK, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 25, 1999

Citations

261 A.D.2d 300 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
691 N.Y.S.2d 407

Citing Cases

Bradbury v. 342 West 30th Street Corp.

Accordingly, the matter should be remanded for a recalculation of the amount of the money judgment. The…

Bethel United Pentecostal Church, Inc. v. Westbury 55 Realty Corp.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from by Westbury 55 Realty Corp., Interamerican…