Opinion
CIVIL ACTION No. 11-6337
05-29-2012
ALBERT A. KUBIAK, Plaintiff, v. STACEY HARRIS, et al., Defendants.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 29th day of May, 2012, after consideration of Plaintiff, Albert A. Kubiak's ("Kubiak"), Motion for Reconsideration, Defendants, Stacey Harris, Leslie Cain, and Dominic Butterline's (collectively, "Defendants"), Motion for Protective Order and Sanctions, Kubiak's Motion for Sanctions, and the numerous Responses and Replies of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Kubiak's Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. No. 13) is DENIED;
2. Defendants' Motion for Protective Order (Doc. No. 14) is DENIED;
3. Defendants' Motion for Sanctions (Doc. No. 14) is DENIED; and
4. Kubiak's Motion for Sanctions (Doc. No. 16) is DENIED.
BY THE COURT:
_____________
ROBERT F. KELLY
SENIOR JUDGE