From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Krys v. Sugrue (In re Refco Sec. Litig.)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Sep 9, 2011
07 MDL 1902 (JSR) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 9, 2011)

Opinion

07 MDL 1902 (JSR) 08 Civ. 3065 (JSR) 08 Civ. 3086 (JSR) 10 Civ. 3594 (JSR)

09-09-2011

IN RE REFCO SECURITIES LITIGATION KENNETH M. KRYS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CHRISTOPHER SUGRUE, et al., Defendants. KENNETH M. KRYS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DEUTSCHE BANK SECURITIES INC, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

JED S. RAKOFF, U.S.D.J.

On July 5, 2011, Special Master Daniel J. Capra issued a Report and Recommendation in the above-captioned case recommending that defendants' motion to dismiss certain of plaintiffs' claims based on the doctrine of in pari delicto be denied. After defendants timely submitted objections and plaintiffs responded thereto, the Court heard oral argument on August 15, 2 011 and considered the entire matter de novo. Having done so, the Court finds itself in agreement with Special Master Capra's Report and Recommendation in all material respects and hereby adopts it in full as if incorporated herein.

SO ORDERED,

JED S. RAKOFF, U.S.D.J.

Dated: New York, New York

September 9, 2011


Summaries of

Krys v. Sugrue (In re Refco Sec. Litig.)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Sep 9, 2011
07 MDL 1902 (JSR) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 9, 2011)
Case details for

Krys v. Sugrue (In re Refco Sec. Litig.)

Case Details

Full title:IN RE REFCO SECURITIES LITIGATION KENNETH M. KRYS, et al., Plaintiffs, v…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Sep 9, 2011

Citations

07 MDL 1902 (JSR) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 9, 2011)