See id. To establish prejudice, Hernandez "must show that the due process violations led to a substantially different outcome from that which would have occurred in the absence of these violations." Id. (citation omitted); see also Kruze v. Lynch, 615 Fed.Appx. 857, 865 (6th Cir. 2015) ("In order to establish a due-process violation based on erroneous translation, the petitioner must show error and substantial prejudice." (citation omitted)). Hernandez has not established that he was prejudiced by the use of a Spanish interpreter.
Therefore, "there is little potential that a translation error affected [the IJ's] finding." Popovych, 470 Fed.Appx. at 453; see also Gishta, 121 Fed.Appx. at 591-92; Thapa v. Holder, 572 Fed.Appx. 314, 319 (6th Cir. 2014); Kruze v. Lynch, 615 Fed.Appx. 857, 866 (6th Cir. 2015). Because the petitioners have not demonstrated prejudice, they cannot establish a due-process violation.