Opinion
March 14, 1934.
July 13, 1934.
Workmen's compensation — Employee — Unusual exertion — Injury to old adhesions — Evidence — Award.
In a claim for compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act, the claimant, who was employed in the defendant's mine, testified that, while attempting to move a loaded mine car, he was suddenly stricken with pain and a small lump appeared on his right side. After convalescing for a week he returned to work but continued to suffer pain. Later the pain became too intense and he stopped work. The claimant's physician testified that the employee had undergone an operation for appendicitis about a year before the accident and undoubtedly had some adhesions resulting therefrom and that some of them pulled away when he exerted himself.
In such case there was sufficient competent evidence to sustain the finding of the compensation authorities that the claimant was injured in the course of his employment and the judgment of the court below entered for the claimant will be affirmed.
Appeal No. 287, October T., 1933, by defendant from judgment of C.P., Schuylkill County, March T., 1933, No. 57, in the case of Walter Krutsky v. Hazle Brook Coal Company.
Before TREXLER, P.J., KELLER, CUNNINGHAM, BALDRIGE, STADTFELD, PARKER and JAMES, JJ. Affirmed.
Appeal from award of compensation. Before PALMER, J.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court.
The court sustained the award and dismissed the appeal. Defendant appealed.
Error assigned, among others, was the order of the court.
P.B. Roads, for appellant.
Roger J. Dever, for appellee.
Argued March 14, 1934.
This is an action under the Workmen's Compensation Act. The claimant's right to compensation must be found in the following facts: While working as a miner on April 17, 1931, in the employ of the defendant, he loaded a car and when the car was loaded he began to push it using a sprag in the wheel, and putting his shoulder against the car, and every time he pushed it, before he could get his shoulder out, it would come back in the same place. Continuing his exertion to move the car something "busted" in his side. A little lump came out. The workman was frightened, had pain, and lay down on the road waiting for his fellow-workmen, and finally one of them came and he told him what had happened. This was about one-half hour after he was stricken, without any one being with him in the meanwhile. He reported the accident to the company; he walked home; saw the doctor afterwards. He stayed home a week. The doctor then told him to go to work. He continued to work suffering pain in the locality until it became too intense and on October 17th, he stopped work and has been unable to work ever since. Dr. Nash, who was called for the claimant, testified that the claimant, no doubt, had some adhesions resulting from an operation for appendicitis, and "in making that extra exertion pulled some of the adhesions away." "And I think that is giving him his trouble ever since." Whilst the doctor used on one occasion the word "probably" the whole tenor of his testimony was that the pulling away of the adhesions followed the trauma that occurred when he was trying to move the car. There was sufficient testimony to support the conclusion of the referee. There is also evidence that the claimant is totally disabled.
The judgment is affirmed.