From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Krutiak v. CGR Enterprises, Inc.

Appeals Court of Massachusetts
Oct 23, 1981
12 Mass. App. Ct. 1016 (Mass. App. Ct. 1981)

Opinion

October 23, 1981.


The judgment is to be modified by striking the first sentence of the paragraph numbered 3 and by substituting therefor, after a further hearing before the court (rather than the master), an order containing (1) a detailed description of the specific acts which are to be performed by the defendant CGR Enterprises, Inc., in order to prevent the artificial channeling and discharge of surface water on and from the land of said defendant onto the land of the plaintiffs, and (2) a reasonable time limit for the performance of those acts by said defendant. As so modified the judgment is affirmed with costs of the appeal to the plaintiffs.


Summaries of

Krutiak v. CGR Enterprises, Inc.

Appeals Court of Massachusetts
Oct 23, 1981
12 Mass. App. Ct. 1016 (Mass. App. Ct. 1981)
Case details for

Krutiak v. CGR Enterprises, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DAVID KRUTIAK another vs. CGR ENTERPRISES, INC., another

Court:Appeals Court of Massachusetts

Date published: Oct 23, 1981

Citations

12 Mass. App. Ct. 1016 (Mass. App. Ct. 1981)