From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kruskal v. Martinez

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
May 18, 2016
No. 35,237 (N.M. Ct. App. May. 18, 2016)

Opinion

No. 35,237

05-18-2016

KERRY KRUSKAL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JUAN MARTINEZ and DIANA MARTINEZ, husband and wife, Defendants-Appellees.

Kerry Kruskal Arroyo Seco, NM Pro Se Appellant Carol A. Neelley PC Carol A. Neelley Santa Fe, NM for Appellees


This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TAOS COUNTY
Jeff McElroy, District Judge Kerry Kruskal
Arroyo Seco, NM Pro Se Appellant Carol A. Neelley PC
Carol A. Neelley
Santa Fe, NM for Appellees

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BUSTAMANTE, Judge. {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. {2} Affirmed.

{3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ _________

MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge

WE CONCUR:

/s/ _________
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge /s/ _________
LINDA M. VANZI, Judge


Summaries of

Kruskal v. Martinez

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
May 18, 2016
No. 35,237 (N.M. Ct. App. May. 18, 2016)
Case details for

Kruskal v. Martinez

Case Details

Full title:KERRY KRUSKAL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JUAN MARTINEZ and DIANA MARTINEZ…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

Date published: May 18, 2016

Citations

No. 35,237 (N.M. Ct. App. May. 18, 2016)