From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kruse v. U.S. Bank, N.A.

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Apr 19, 2010
Civil Action No. 09-cv-02302-LTB-BNB (D. Colo. Apr. 19, 2010)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 09-cv-02302-LTB-BNB.

April 19, 2010


ORDER


The parties appeared this afternoon for a scheduling conference. Competing scheduling orders were presented and refused.

IT IS ORDERED that a supplemental scheduling conference is set for May 5, 2010, at 8:30 a.m., in Courtroom 401, 4th floor, Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall prepare a joint revised proposed scheduling order and submit it to the court on or before April 28, 2010.

Counsel for U.S. Bank requested that all communications between counsel be in writing. I find intolerable the notion that counsel appearing in this court cannot cooperate and are unwilling to communicate orally. Counsel must find a way to work together and communicate with one another or replacement counsel should enter its appearance.

Dated April 19, 2010.


Summaries of

Kruse v. U.S. Bank, N.A.

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Apr 19, 2010
Civil Action No. 09-cv-02302-LTB-BNB (D. Colo. Apr. 19, 2010)
Case details for

Kruse v. U.S. Bank, N.A.

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS G. KRUSE, Plaintiff, v. U.S. BANK, N.A., as Trustee, and MARGARET…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Apr 19, 2010

Citations

Civil Action No. 09-cv-02302-LTB-BNB (D. Colo. Apr. 19, 2010)