Opinion
Case No: 1:10-cv-00014
06-27-2013
OPINION AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Third Party Defendant Dean V. Kruse's Request for 30 Days Extension of Set Deadlines, requesting a 30-day extension of the deadline recently set "to conclude this case." (Docket # 82.) Defendants object to the motion, asking the Court to maintain the current deadlines. (Docket # 84.)
Upon a review of the docket, it appears that the only current, and recently set, deadline in this case is the Court's previous order directed to Plaintiff Kruse, Inc., ordering it to obtain counsel within 30 days of May 30, 2013, or be subject to default. (Docket # 81.) On the other hand, there are no deadlines currently facing the individual movant, Dean Kruse, and Kruse, a non-lawyer, cannot appear or move (as he appears to be doing) for an extension of time on the behalf of Kruse, Inc., a corporation. See, e.g., United States v. Hagerman, 545 F.3d 579, 581 (7th Cir. 2008); Scandia Down Corp. v. Euroquilt, Inc., 772 F.2d 1423, 1427 (7th Cir. 1985).
Accordingly, Dean Kruse's Request for 30 Days Extension of Set Deadlines (Docket # 82) is DENIED.
SO ORDERED.
____________
Roger B. Cosbey,
United States Magistrate Judge