From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Krupski v. Costa Crociere, S. P.A.

Supreme Court of the United States
Jan 15, 2010
558 U.S. 1142 (2010)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

In Krupski, the plaintiff sought damages for a slip and fall while she was on board a cruise ship and sued Costa Cruise Lines, the entity listed on the front of her cruise ticket.

Summary of this case from Nev. Fleet v. FedEx Corp.
See 3 Summaries

Opinion

No. 09–337.

2010-01-15

Wanda KRUPSKI, petitioner, v. COSTA CROCIERE, S.p.A.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted. Brief of petitioner to be filed on or before Thursday, February 25, 2010. Brief of respondent to be filed on or before Thursday, March 25, 2010. Reply brief, if any, to be filed in accordance with Rule 25.3 of the Rules of this Court.

Summaries of

Krupski v. Costa Crociere, S. P.A.

Supreme Court of the United States
Jan 15, 2010
558 U.S. 1142 (2010)

In Krupski, the plaintiff sought damages for a slip and fall while she was on board a cruise ship and sued Costa Cruise Lines, the entity listed on the front of her cruise ticket.

Summary of this case from Nev. Fleet v. FedEx Corp.

In Krupski, in contrast, plaintiff had that knowledge, and the Supreme Court's resolution of her case does not affect plaintiff's here.

Summary of this case from Burdine v. Kaiser

In Krupski, the Supreme Court clarified that for purposes of relation back, the question is not whether a plaintiff knew or should have known of the identity of the proper defendant, but whether the proper defendant knew or should have known that it would have been named as a defendant but for an error.

Summary of this case from Maggi v. RAS Development, Inc.
Case details for

Krupski v. Costa Crociere, S. P.A.

Case Details

Full title:Wanda KRUPSKI, petitioner, v. COSTA CROCIERE, S.p.A.

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Jan 15, 2010

Citations

558 U.S. 1142 (2010)
130 S. Ct. 1133
175 L. Ed. 2d 941
78 U.S.L.W. 3131

Citing Cases

Wandschneider v. Tuesday Morning, Inc.

Federal Rule 15(c)(1)(C), and its Oklahoma equivalent set forth in Rule 2015(C)(3), have three essential…

Smith v. Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation

This is not a situation where the plaintiffs' conduct suggests that their failure to name BCFP was the result…

13 Citing Cases