From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Krupinski v. Nitkin

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Sep 6, 2016
SC: 153095 (Mich. Sep. 6, 2016)

Opinion

SC: 153095

09-06-2016

DONALD KRUPINSKI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DONALD A. NITKIN and LAURA R. NITKIN, Defendants, and COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.


Order

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen, Justices COA: 321780
Macomb CC: 2011-002924-NI

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 17, 2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

BERNSTEIN, J., did not participate due to his prior relationship with the Sam Bernstein Law Firm.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 6, 2016

/s/_________

Clerk


Summaries of

Krupinski v. Nitkin

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Sep 6, 2016
SC: 153095 (Mich. Sep. 6, 2016)
Case details for

Krupinski v. Nitkin

Case Details

Full title:DONALD KRUPINSKI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DONALD A. NITKIN and LAURA R…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Sep 6, 2016

Citations

SC: 153095 (Mich. Sep. 6, 2016)