From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kruger v. New York Telephone Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 5, 1951
279 App. Div. 622 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)

Opinion

October 5, 1951.

Present — Taylor, P.J., McCurn, Vaughan, Kimball and Piper, JJ.


Order entered May 4, 1951, modified on the facts as follows: in paragraph "1" by inserting the words "in the `Mill Supply Room'" after the word "defendant" in the third line thereof and by striking therefrom the words "on the premises"; in paragraph "4" by inserting the words "in the `Mill Supply Room'" after the word "were" in the second line thereof and by striking therefrom the words "on the premises"; in the "further Ordered" paragraph of paragraph 4, in the eleventh line thereof, by inserting the words "in the `Mill Supply Room'" after the words "work performed", and by striking out the words "and any telephone service rendered", and as so modified, order affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Order entered June 1, 1951, insofar as appealed from, modified on the facts by adding thereto the following new ordering paragraphs: "6. To testify and give information concerning the extension number of said telephone if known to plaintiff and all details in connection with the location, installation and maintenance of other telephones, telephone wires, interoffice communication systems, adding machines and other electrical appliances located in the `Mill Supply Room' at the time of the alleged accident. All facts and circumstances surrounding the so-called installation of the telephone located on plaintiff's desk and alleged representations made at that time and the name, or if unknown, the description of the person by whom made and the name of the person or persons to whom made. 7. To testify and give information concerning all the facts and circumstances surrounding the happening of the accident alleged in the complaint" and as so modified the order insofar as appealed from is affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. All concur. (Appeal from an order granting plaintiff an examination of defendant before trial; also appeal from part of an order denying a portion of defendant's motion to examine plaintiff before trial.)


Summaries of

Kruger v. New York Telephone Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 5, 1951
279 App. Div. 622 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)
Case details for

Kruger v. New York Telephone Company

Case Details

Full title:EDWIN C. KRUGER, Respondent, v. NEW YORK TELEPHONE COMPANY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 5, 1951

Citations

279 App. Div. 622 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)

Citing Cases

Southwestern Tel. Tel. Co. v. Smithdeal

The fact that the appellant may have had authority from the city council, and under the acts of the…

Southwestern Tel. Tel. Co. v. Smithdeal

The fact that the appellant may have had authority from the city council and under the Acts of the…