From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

KRUG v. ROBERTS

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Jun 13, 2011
Civil Action No. 10-02069 (ABJ) (D.D.C. Jun. 13, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 10-02069 (ABJ).

June 13, 2011


MEMORANDUM OPINION


This matter is before the Court on plaintiff's pro se complaint filed on December 3, 2010. The Court will dismiss the complaint sua sponte for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

"If the court determines at any time that it lacks subject-matter jurisdiction, the court must dismiss the action." Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(h)(3).

Plaintiff is a prisoner at the United States Penitentiary in Salters, South Carolina suing the nine justices of the United States Supreme Court seeking damages for the justices' alleged failure to recuse themselves from considering a petition for a writ of certiorari that plaintiff filed in 2009. Compl ¶ 7. This Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to review the decisions of the Supreme Court. In re Marin, 956 F.2d 339 (D.C. Cir. 1992). Denial of a petition for writ of certiorari is a judicial action and the Supreme Court justices are absolutely immune from liability. Reddy v. O'Connor, 520 F. Supp. 2d 124, 130 (D.D.C. 2007) (citing Sindram v. Suda, 986 F.2d 1459 (D.C. Cir. 1993).

Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed. A separate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.


Summaries of

KRUG v. ROBERTS

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Jun 13, 2011
Civil Action No. 10-02069 (ABJ) (D.D.C. Jun. 13, 2011)
Case details for

KRUG v. ROBERTS

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY CHARLES KRUG, Plaintiff, v. JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR., et al.…

Court:United States District Court, D. Columbia

Date published: Jun 13, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 10-02069 (ABJ) (D.D.C. Jun. 13, 2011)