From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kroy Ip Holdings v. Groupon, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jun 14, 2021
No. 2020-1916 (Fed. Cir. Jun. 14, 2021)

Opinion

2020-1916 2020-1917

06-14-2021

KROY IP HOLDINGS, LLC, Appellant v. GROUPON, INC., Appellee

Jonathan K. Waldrop, Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP, Redwood Shores, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by Marcus Barber, John Walter Downing, Darcy L. Jones, Heather Kim, Jack Shaw. Thomas Lee Duston, Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for appellee. Also represented by Sandip Patel, Raymond R. Ricordati.


This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2019-00044, IPR2019-00061.

Jonathan K. Waldrop, Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP, Redwood Shores, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by Marcus Barber, John Walter Downing, Darcy L. Jones, Heather Kim, Jack Shaw.

Thomas Lee Duston, Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for appellee. Also represented by Sandip Patel, Raymond R. Ricordati.

JUDGMENT

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is

Ordered and Adjudged:

Per Curiam

Moore, Chief Judge, Lourie and Dyk, Circuit Judges.

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.


Summaries of

Kroy Ip Holdings v. Groupon, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jun 14, 2021
No. 2020-1916 (Fed. Cir. Jun. 14, 2021)
Case details for

Kroy Ip Holdings v. Groupon, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:KROY IP HOLDINGS, LLC, Appellant v. GROUPON, INC., Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Jun 14, 2021

Citations

No. 2020-1916 (Fed. Cir. Jun. 14, 2021)

Citing Cases

Kroy IP Holdings, LLC v. Groupon, Inc.

And on June 14, 2021, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit summarily affirmed the…