From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Krow v. PineBridge Invs. Holdings U.S.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 21, 2022
19 CIVIL 5711 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 21, 2022)

Opinion

19 CIVIL 5711 (ER)

03-21-2022

SOLOMON KROW, Plaintiff, v. PINEBRIDGE INVESTMENTS HOLDINGS U.S. LLC and RONAN MCGUINNESS, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion & Order dated March 21, 2022, PineBridge's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED as to Krow's failure to accommodate claims under the ADA and his claims for discrimination and retaliation based on his termination. His remaining state and city claims are DISMISSED without prejudice; accordingly, the case is closed.


Summaries of

Krow v. PineBridge Invs. Holdings U.S.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 21, 2022
19 CIVIL 5711 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 21, 2022)
Case details for

Krow v. PineBridge Invs. Holdings U.S.

Case Details

Full title:SOLOMON KROW, Plaintiff, v. PINEBRIDGE INVESTMENTS HOLDINGS U.S. LLC and…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Mar 21, 2022

Citations

19 CIVIL 5711 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 21, 2022)