From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kroog v. Dirico

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 12, 2003
305 A.D.2d 468 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-05977

Argued April 25, 2003.

May 12, 2003.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Weiss, J.), dated May 30, 2002, which granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Abbott Bushlow Pond, Ridgewood, N.Y. (Alan L. Bushlow of counsel), for appellant.

O'Connor, Redd, Gollihue Sklarin, LLP, White Plains, N.Y. (Christian J. Soller of counsel), for respondents.

Before: ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P., ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, SANDRA L. TOWNES, STEPHEN G. CRANE, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Upon the defendants' prima facie showing that the plaintiff did not sufficiently identify the cause of his accident (see Capone v. 450 Lexington Venture, 300 A.D.2d 428, 429; Moody v. Woolworth Co., 288 A.D.2d 446, 447; Prisco v. Long Is. Univ., 258 A.D.2d 451, 452), the plaintiff failed to raise a triable question of fact (see Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320).

The plaintiff's remaining contentions are without merit.

FLORIO, J.P., SCHMIDT, TOWNES and CRANE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kroog v. Dirico

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 12, 2003
305 A.D.2d 468 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Kroog v. Dirico

Case Details

Full title:MARTIN J. KROOG, appellant, v. FRANK DIRICO, ET AL., respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 12, 2003

Citations

305 A.D.2d 468 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
758 N.Y.S.2d 841