From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kronowitz v. Schlansky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1935
243 App. Div. 729 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Opinion

February, 1935.

Present — Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Tompkins, Davis and Johnston, JJ.


Motion to dispense with printing the testimony on the trial denied. The plaintiffs, appellants, are entitled to relief either by a bill of exceptions or by an abbreviated record. ( Capone v. Matteo Realty Corporation, 241 App. Div. 845.) The time to perfect and argue the appeal is extended to the April term.


Summaries of

Kronowitz v. Schlansky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1935
243 App. Div. 729 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)
Case details for

Kronowitz v. Schlansky

Case Details

Full title:LOUIS KRONOWITZ and ADOLPH LASZLO, Doing Business under the Trade Name and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 1, 1935

Citations

243 App. Div. 729 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)