From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kroner v. Isensee

Oregon Supreme Court
Jun 4, 1929
275 P. 1119 (Or. 1929)

Opinion

Argued March 28, 1929

Affirmed April 2, 1929 Rehearing denied June 4, 1929

From Multnomah: GEORGE TAZWELL, Judge.

For appellant there was a brief over the names of Mr. Harry G. Hoy and Mr. Edward O. Doxey, with an oral argument by Mr. Hoy.

For respondent there was a brief and oral argument by Mr. Henry Hartje.


AFFIRMED.


The court, having heard the argument and discussed the reasons advanced by appellant for reversing this case, are of the opinion that none of the questions discussed and urged by appellant, who is defendant, is meritorious. The case presents no new principle of law. It was fairly tried below and the court's instructions were fair to defendant. For these reasons the judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Kroner v. Isensee

Oregon Supreme Court
Jun 4, 1929
275 P. 1119 (Or. 1929)
Case details for

Kroner v. Isensee

Case Details

Full title:ERNST KRONER v. WM. ISENSEE

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Jun 4, 1929

Citations

275 P. 1119 (Or. 1929)
275 P. 1119