From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kronenberger v. Kronenberger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 27, 1994
204 A.D.2d 1059 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

May 27, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Monroe County, Stander, J.

Present — Green, J.P., Lawton, Fallon, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: The parties were divorced by judgment of Supreme Court, entered June 18, 1991, which incorporated but did not merge the terms of the parties' separation agreement. The separation agreement provided for joint custody of the parties' children, with primary residence with respondent mother. On August 26, 1991, petitioner father brought an order to show cause seeking physical custody of the children. On September 18, 1991, an order was entered awarding temporary physical custody of the children to respondent. Thereafter, on July 6, 1992, petitioner brought another order to show cause seeking physical custody. Supreme Court, by order dated September 18, 1992, dismissed the prior application for a change in custody, without prejudice, and again awarded respondent temporary physical custody of the children. On October 15, 1993, petitioner brought an order to show cause, this time seeking sole custody of the children. On October 27, 1993, Supreme Court granted the motion of respondent's counsel to withdraw and scheduled a pretrial conference, which was held on November 18, 1993. Respondent's newly-retained counsel, petitioner's counsel and the Law Guardian attended the pretrial conference, where, without a hearing, the court granted petitioner's order to show cause, transferred temporary physical custody of the children to petitioner, granted visitation to respondent and terminated petitioner's obligation to pay child support.

"Absent a showing of extraordinary circumstances, it was error for Supreme Court to make a temporary custody determination in an ex parte order to show cause" (Alberts v. Alberts, 168 A.D.2d 1004; Biagi v. Biagi, 124 A.D.2d 770). We, therefore, reverse and remit the matter to Supreme Court for a hearing on the issue of custody.


Summaries of

Kronenberger v. Kronenberger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 27, 1994
204 A.D.2d 1059 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Kronenberger v. Kronenberger

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN G. KRONENBERGER, Respondent, v. LAUREN A. KRONENBERGER, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 27, 1994

Citations

204 A.D.2d 1059 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
614 N.Y.S.2d 348

Citing Cases

Posporelis v. Posporelis

At the conclusion of the trial, the court decided not to hold the Lincoln hearing "in order to spare the…

Matter of Smith v. Patrowski

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We agree with respondent that Family Court erred when…