From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Krolczyk v. Dudinski

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Oct 27, 2014
No. 65748 (Nev. Oct. 27, 2014)

Opinion

No. 65748

10-27-2014

JAMIE KROLCZYK, Appellant, v. APRIL DUDINSKI, Respondent.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is an appeal from a district court order concerning child custody. Fifth Judicial District Court, Nye County; Kimberly A. Wanker, Judge.

When our preliminary review of this appeal revealed a potential jurisdictional defect, we directed appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. This court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal only when the appeal is authorized by statute or court rule. Taylor Constr. Co. v. Hilton Hotels Corp., 100 Nev. 207, 209, 678 P.2d 1152, 1153 (1984). NRAP 3A(b)(7) allows an appeal from an order that finally establishes or alters child custody. It appeared that the district court's April 18, 2014, order, which is the subject of this appeal, did not finally establish or alter child custody under NRAP 3A(b)(7). The order awarded respondent primary physical custody of the parties' minor child and set the matter for a hearing on visitation in May 2014. In response to this court's show cause order, appellant indicated that the district court conducted a hearing on the visitation issue in May 2014, and that a proposed order was sent to the district court on August 5, 2014, but the order had yet to be entered.

Thereafter, this court allowed appellant 30 days to obtain from the district court a written, signed, and file-stamped order resolving the visitation issue and to submit a copy of that order to this court. We cautioned appellant that failure to comply with this court's order and obtain a written district court order that finally establishes visitation would result in the dismissal of this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. To date, appellant has not filed a response to this court's show cause order, which was due on October 15, 2014. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed without prejudice to appellant's right to timely appeal from a district court order that finally establishes child custody and visitation.

We noted that the proposed unsigned order attached to appellant's response set forth a yearly winter break visitation schedule but only a temporary summer visitation schedule for the upcoming summer. To be appealable, an order must establish custody and visitation with finality. See NRAP 3A(b)(7).

It is so ORDERED.

/s/_________, J.

Pickering

/s/_________, J.

Parraguirre

/s/_________, J.

Saitta
cc: Hon. Kimberly A. Wanker, District Judge

Baumgardner Law

April Dudinski

Nye County Clerk


Summaries of

Krolczyk v. Dudinski

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Oct 27, 2014
No. 65748 (Nev. Oct. 27, 2014)
Case details for

Krolczyk v. Dudinski

Case Details

Full title:JAMIE KROLCZYK, Appellant, v. APRIL DUDINSKI, Respondent.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Oct 27, 2014

Citations

No. 65748 (Nev. Oct. 27, 2014)