From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kroemer v. Tantillo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 2, 2003
305 A.D.2d 1038 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

CA 02-01697

May 2, 2003.

Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Ontario County (Galloway, J.), entered May 7, 2002, which, inter alia, denied plaintiff's motion to reargue.

KENT A. KROEMER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT PRO SE.

PHILLIPS, LYTLE, HITCHCOCK, BLAINE HUBER LLP, ROCHESTER (JENNIFER A. TUMMINELLI OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P.J., GREEN, WISNER, BURNS, AND LAWTON, JJ.


ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs ( see Empire Ins. Co. v. Food City, 167 A.D.2d 983, 984).


Summaries of

Kroemer v. Tantillo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 2, 2003
305 A.D.2d 1038 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Kroemer v. Tantillo

Case Details

Full title:KENT A. KROEMER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. R. MICHAEL TANTILLO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 2, 2003

Citations

305 A.D.2d 1038 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
758 N.Y.S.2d 883