Summary
holding the size of steps and their lack of a hand rail was an open and obvious danger
Summary of this case from Estabrook v. United StatesOpinion
No. 06-P-1109.
May 9, 2007.
Decision Pursuant to Rule 1:28.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Krivoy v. Sullivan
Appeals Court of Massachusetts
May 9, 2007
68 Mass. App. Ct. 1121 (Mass. App. Ct. 2007)
Summaries of
Krivoy v. Sullivan
Appeals Court of Massachusetts
May 9, 2007
68 Mass. App. Ct. 1121 (Mass. App. Ct. 2007)
holding the size of steps and their lack of a hand rail was an open and obvious danger
Summary of this case from Estabrook v. United StatesCase details for
Krivoy v. Sullivan
Case Details
Full title:GALINA KRIVOY another v. EDWARD J. SULLIVAN others
Court:Appeals Court of Massachusetts
Date published: May 9, 2007
Citations
68 Mass. App. Ct. 1121 (Mass. App. Ct. 2007)
865 N.E.2d 1209
Citing Cases
Estabrook v. United States
Further, even assuming arguendo that the discretionary function exception did not apply, Plaintiff's claim…